Prince Andrew is once again testing the limits of royal rehabilitation, with reports that he wants to publish a tell-all memoir casting himself as a casualty of the #MeToo era rather than a beneficiary of its scrutiny. The idea, floated after years of reputational damage linked to Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Giuffre, would mark his boldest attempt yet to recast his downfall as something done to him, not by him.
Such a project would collide with a grim reality: Andrew Mountbatton Windsor has already been described as having completed his fall from grace, and any book that paints him as a victim risks deepening the sense that he has learned little from the scandals that engulfed him.
Inside the reported memoir plan and the ‘#MeToo victim’ narrative
Reports that Prince Andrew wants to “set the record straight” with a book have circulated since at least early 2023, when he was said to be exploring a memoir in the mould of Prince Harry’s, designed to counter years of damaging coverage and legal scrutiny. At that stage, briefings suggested he believed a detailed personal account could repair his standing after his settlement with Virginia Giuffre, with one report describing how Prince Andrew hoped to emulate Prince Harry’s commercial and reputational reset. By late 2025, fresh reporting indicated that the idea had hardened into a more explosive proposal, with sources claiming Prince Andrew was actively planning a tell-all that would lean on his insider knowledge of royal life and the Epstein circle, and that he “knows where the bodies are buried.”
At the same time, there have been counter-briefings that he privately assured his brother he would not go down the publishing route, a sign of how contentious the idea is within the family. One account describes how Prince Andrew Reportedly Told Brother King Charles That Tell projects and similar Books Aren, In His Future, a pledge apparently made directly to the monarch. The tension between these assurances and the renewed chatter about a manuscript underscores the central risk: any memoir that positions Andrew as a #MeToo casualty would not only reopen wounds around his association with Jeffrey Epstein, it would also test the already strained trust between the disgraced royal and the institution that stripped him of his public role.
Legal shadows, rival memoirs and a prince at ‘all-time low’
The timing of Andrew’s reported publishing ambitions is not accidental. His legal entanglements with Jeffrey Epstein remain a defining feature of his public image, even after he agreed to pay a reported multi-million dollar settlement to Virginia Giuffre in twenty2 without admitting any wrongdoing, a deal that was widely covered as part of the Developments in the Jeffrey Epstein case involving Britain’s Prince Andrew. His attempt to distance himself from Epstein through that settlement and through public statements has never fully displaced the image cemented by his disastrous television interview and the subsequent loss of his royal patronages. Compounding the pressure, a separate memoir by one of Epstein’s accusers has revived scrutiny of the network that linked Epstein to powerful men, with Memoir by Prince Andrew’s and Epstein’s accuser reignites allegations that virginia Ju was a 16-year-old employee at Donald Trump’s Florida resort when she was recruited by Galain Maxw, a reminder that the scandal stretches from Buckingham Palace to Mar-a-Lago.
For Andrew personally, the publication of Virginia Giuffre’s own book, Nobody’s Girl, has been described as a fresh humiliation that drags his past conduct back into the spotlight just as he is trying to argue that he has been unfairly treated. One report notes that Prince Andrew humiliated again as Virginia Giuffre book revives his infamous “sweaty” alibi and is branded “morally blind” by experts, while another says the same memoir leaves Prince Andrew faces ‘all-time low’ as Virginia Giuffre haunts royal reputation from beyond the grave. In that context, any attempt by Andrew to frame himself as a #MeToo victim would be read against a backdrop in which his accusers are already telling their stories in print, and in which the public has been repeatedly reminded of his ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the broader culture of impunity that the #MeToo movement set out to challenge.
Exile, housing battles and a monarchy wary of more damage
Behind the scenes, Andrew’s personal circumstances have grown more precarious, which may help explain the appeal of a lucrative book deal and a narrative reset. Commentators have described how Andrew Mountbatton Windsor’s fall from grace is “complete,” with one royal outlook for the coming year painting a picture of a man effectively exiled from frontline royal duties and facing an uncertain future inside the family hierarchy, a view captured in analysis of Andrew Mountbatton Windsor. His living arrangements have become a flashpoint, with reports that he has resisted pressure to leave Royal Lodge in Windsor, the sprawling home he has occupied for years, even as the palace looks to rationalise its estate. A royal expert has warned that his refusal to budge from Royal Lodge in Windsor could leave him effectively homeless, with Marsh Farm on the Sandringham estate floated as a possible, and much smaller, alternative.
At the same time, there are suggestions that Andrew is weighing a more radical escape from the British glare. One report says that in Jan, Andrew was considering a move to the Middle East, with analysts warning that Once he relocates, his next move could affect both his personal privacy and the monarchy’s image and perception at home and abroad. That prospect, combined with the fact that PRINCE, ANDREW, JEF and other figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein continue to dominate coverage of the scandal, leaves the institution acutely sensitive to anything that might reignite public anger. It is in this fraught environment, where PRINCE and ANDREW and JEF remain shorthand for a wider reckoning, that a memoir casting Andrew as a #MeToo victim would land. For a monarchy still grappling with the fallout from his association with Jeffrey Epstein, the risk is clear: a book meant to rehabilitate him could instead cement the sense that he has misread the moment, and that his story is not one of persecution, but of accountability finally catching up.
More from Vinyl and Velvet:
Leave a Reply