Sabrina Carpenter walked into the Grammys expecting headlines about her music and stagecraft, and she got them, just not in the way her team probably hoped. After performing with a live bird on stage, the pop star is now at the center of a very public clash with PETA, which has blasted the stunt as “stupid” and “cruel” and is using the moment to push a broader message about animals in entertainment. What started as a flashy visual gag has turned into a full‑blown culture‑war skirmish over what is fair game in a televised performance.
The backlash has unfolded fast, with PETA calling out Carpenter directly, fans and critics arguing in the comments, and other artists being held up as examples of how to do things differently. The fight is not just about one bird or one song, it is about how far pop stars can go in chasing spectacle before they run into a new generation’s expectations around animal welfare.
The Grammys moment that lit the fuse
On music’s biggest night, Sabrina Carpenter leaned into drama, making a theatrical entrance for her hit single “The Manchild” that included a live bird as part of the staging. Reports describe the singer stepping into the spotlight with the animal incorporated into a stylized performance that also featured a cast of characters, including an astronaut and a priest, all orbiting her as she moved through the song. The idea was clear enough: a surreal, meme‑ready tableau that matched the heightened tone of her recent releases and cemented her status as one of pop’s most talked‑about performers.
Instead, the bird became the story. Within hours, animal rights advocates were zeroing in on the choice to bring a live animal into the chaos of a televised awards show, arguing that the noise, lights, and crowd are the opposite of a safe environment. PETA, which had already been tracking how stars use animals on stage, seized on the Grammys performance as a textbook example of what it sees as outdated spectacle, pointing to the live bird and the elaborate staging around “The Manchild” as proof that the industry still treats animals as props.
PETA’s sharp response and choice of words
Once the performance aired, PETA did not tiptoe around its reaction. The group posted a graphic aimed directly at the singer, opening with “Hey Sabrina” and declaring that bringing a live bird onto the Grammys stage is “stupid, slow, useless, and cruel.” That language, which PETA attached to an image referencing the performance, framed the decision as not just a bad call but a childish one, and it set the tone for the rest of the group’s messaging. In follow‑up comments, PETA accused Sabrina Carpenter of “cruelty” after her Grammys appearance and argued that no amount of rehearsal or backstage care can make a bird comfortable under that kind of pressure, urging fans to keep animals “out of the #GRAMMYs” entirely.
The organization went further, saying the “Manchild” singer was “giving childlike behavior” and insisting that artists should “Leave animals out of the #GRAMMYs,” turning the phrase into a rallying cry for supporters who have long pushed for a ban on live animals at major shows. In its posts, PETA contrasted Carpenter’s staging with its vision of ethical entertainment, where animals are left “free in the open sky” instead of being flown into arenas for a few seconds of screen time. The group’s social media accounts amplified that message, using the Grammys clip as a case study in what it sees as the wrong side of the line and labeling the use of a live bird as “childlike behavior” that belongs in the past.
How fans and commenters are splitting over the backlash
As PETA’s posts spread, the reaction online turned into its own spectacle. On one side were animal rights supporters and viewers who agreed that the Grammys stage is no place for a bird, echoing the group’s argument that the stunt was unnecessary and out of touch. On the other were fans who felt the outrage was overblown, pointing out that no injuries were reported and accusing critics of using Sabrina Carpenter as a lightning rod for broader frustrations. Comment threads filled up with people debating whether the performance was genuinely harmful or just an easy target in an era when every awards show moment is instantly dissected.
A Facebook post highlighting how the activist organization PETA, formally known as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is speaking out against Sabrina Carpenter’s Grammys performance captured that divide in real time, with some commenters cheering the group on and others mocking the uproar as a “slow news day.” The same post showed how quickly the conversation can veer off course, with users dragging in unrelated political grievances and culture‑war talking points while still circling back to the question of whether the People for the had finally picked the right target or gone too far.
Where Sabrina Carpenter stands in the crossfire
For Sabrina Carpenter, the fallout is a reminder of how quickly a career‑defining performance can turn into a PR headache. She arrived at the Grammys as one of pop’s buzziest names, with “The Manchild” and her song “Abracadabra” helping to cement her as a headliner, and she left with her name trending alongside accusations of animal cruelty. Social posts and entertainment coverage now routinely mention that she is facing backlash from PETA following her 2026 Grammys performance, framing the moment as a test of how she navigates controversy at a time when every creative choice is scrutinized through an ethical lens.
So far, the loudest words in the conversation are coming from PETA, not from the singer herself, which has only fueled more speculation about how her team will respond. One widely shared post noted that Sabrina Carpenter is facing backlash from PETA following her Grammys performance, underscoring how the narrative has shifted from her vocals and choreography to the ethics of her staging. Whether she doubles down on the artistic choice, quietly drops the bird from future shows, or uses the moment to engage with animal welfare concerns will shape how this episode sits in her broader story as a pop star.
What PETA wants the industry to learn from the bird
Behind the sharp language, PETA is clearly trying to turn this dust‑up into a teachable moment for the entire entertainment industry. In its posts, the group has not only called Sabrina Carpenter “stupid and cruel” but also urged artists and producers to rethink the use of live animals in performances altogether, arguing that no amount of training can make a Grammys stage feel safe for a bird that would rather be flying outside. The organization has used the controversy to highlight its long‑standing position that animals should not be used as props, pointing to the Grammys as a high‑profile example of what it wants to end and accusing the singer of “cruelty” after her appearance.
At the same time, PETA has been careful to show that it is not against pop spectacle itself, just certain versions of it. In its criticism of the Grammys, the group praised other artists who build their brands around sustainability and respect for animals, holding them up as proof that stars can deliver viral performances without live creatures on stage. Coverage of the backlash notes that the organization has contrasted Sabrina Carpenter’s bird‑centered staging with performers who keep animals “free in the open sky,” reinforcing the idea that the real flex in 2026 is finding creative ways to thrill audiences without putting a living being under stress. That message has been amplified in reports that describe how the animal rights organization is using the Grammys moment to push for a broader cultural shift.
More from Vinyl and Velvet:
Leave a Reply