Rob Gronkowski is not mincing words about Bill Belichick being left out of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The former New England Patriots tight end has called the decision everything from “asinine” to “absolutely absurd,” turning what could have been a quiet voting quirk into a full-on referendum on how the sport treats its greatest coach. His reaction, echoed by former colleagues and coaches, has sharpened the spotlight on a process that somehow sidelined the architect of a two-decade dynasty.
At the heart of Gronkowski’s frustration is a simple idea: if Belichick’s résumé does not clear the bar, then the bar might be broken. With multiple Super Bowl rings, hundreds of wins, and a reputation for redefining modern defense and game planning, Belichick’s omission has become less about one man’s legacy and more about what the Hall of Fame is supposed to represent.
Gronkowski’s outrage and the case for Belichick
From the moment the Hall of Fame results became public, Rob Gronkowski has sounded like a star player defending his coach in a locker room that suddenly feels a little too quiet. In one interview he flatly labeled the snub “asinine,” a word that captured both his disbelief and his sense that the voters had overthought a no-brainer. He pointed out that Bill Belichick’s body of work, from his early days as the New York Giants’ defensive coordinator to his run in New England, should have made him an automatic selection, a point he underscored while reacting to the Hall of Fame decision. Gronkowski’s tone was not nostalgic, it was incredulous, as if he were being told Tom Brady had to re-try out for a roster spot.
That disbelief has come with specifics, not just emotion. Gronkowski has repeatedly highlighted Belichick’s staggering win total, noting that his former coach has 333 victories when combining regular season and playoff games, a figure that ranks second all time and is paired with more total Super Bowl rings than any other individual in league history. Those numbers, which he referenced while speaking alongside Bruce Arians, are the backbone of his argument that leaving Belichick out on the first try is less a minor oversight and more a fundamental misread of football history, a point reinforced when he cited those 333 wins and Super Bowl totals.
Support from Brady, Arians and the wider football world
Gronkowski is not standing alone on this hill. Tom Brady, the quarterback who shared six Lombardi Trophies with Belichick in New England, has been just as blunt in his support. In a recent appearance, Brady was asked to weigh in on the Hall of Fame debate and did not hesitate, saying that if he had to pick one football mind, “I’m taking Bill Belichick,” a line that landed with the kind of finality only Brady can deliver. His backing, delivered in a segment that clocked in at 49 seconds before stretching to 55 with follow-up reaction, underscored how central Belichick was to the Patriots’ run and how baffling it is to see his name missing from Canton’s latest roll call, a stance Brady shared while reacting to the snub.
Bruce Arians, who coached Rob Gronkowski and Tom Brady with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, has also chimed in, and his reaction has the feel of one coach recognizing another’s place in the game’s hierarchy. Appearing with Rob Gronkowski and Bruce Arians on TODAY, he listened as Gronkowski said, “Obviously there had to be some voters that held grudges, but that should be overlooked,” a pointed suggestion that personal feelings might have crept into what is supposed to be an objective process. Arians nodded along as Gronkowski argued that Belichick’s strategic genius and championship résumé should have overridden any lingering resentment, a moment captured when Rob Gronkowski and reacted on air.
The voting process under the microscope
Once the initial shock wore off, attention quickly shifted to how the Hall of Fame voting actually works, and whether the system itself set Belichick up for this kind of surprise. Under the current rules, the selection committee is made up of 50 voters who each choose three of five finalists, and between one and three candidates ultimately get in if they receive at least 40 votes. That structure, which concentrates enormous power in a relatively small group, leaves plenty of room for strategic voting, personal biases, or philosophical disagreements about coaching legacies, all of which can combine to keep even a towering figure like Belichick on the outside looking in, as outlined in a breakdown of how the 50 voters operate.
Gronkowski has hinted that this structure might be part of the problem. Speaking on a morning show, he noted that “obviously” some voters seemed to be holding something against his former coach, and he argued that those personal feelings should not outweigh a résumé built on multiple Super Bowl titles and decades of innovation. He pointed to Belichick’s unmatched collection of Super Bowl rings and his 333 wins as evidence that the process, not the coach, is what needs scrutiny, a point he emphasized while reacting to the voting outcome.
More from Vinyl and Velvet:
Leave a Reply