The story of 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos has moved from a quiet Minnesota neighborhood to the center of a national fight over how the United States treats migrant children. His case began with an ordinary preschool pickup and ended with federal agents taking him away alongside his father. Now, as relatives, lawyers, and advocates scramble for answers, the key question is simple and urgent: where is Liam today, and what happens next for this family.
What is clear so far is that Liam and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, are asylum seekers who had already entered the immigration system before agents showed up. Their journey, from a classroom at Valley View Elementary to a family detention facility in Texas, has exposed deep tensions around enforcement tactics, child welfare, and the Trump administration’s approach to detaining kids.
Where Liam Is Now
According to the family’s legal team, Liam is not in some unknown black box of the immigration system, but he is far from home. The family attorney, Marc Prokosch, has said that Conejo Ramos and his father are currently being held together at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas, a facility used to detain families while their cases move forward. That means the 5-year-old Minneapolis boy is now living in a secured complex hundreds of miles from the Columbia Heights neighborhood where he went to preschool. For relatives and school staff who watched him leave in a car seat, the idea of Liam sleeping in a detention center instead of his own bed has become the emotional core of the public outcry.
Early confusion about his whereabouts helped fuel that outrage. Some social media posts and rumors suggested that Liam might have been taken to an ICE detention center in El Paso, but a detailed fact check found that was not accurate. Reporters who reviewed federal records and the Online Detainee Locator concluded that Liam Conejo Ramos and Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias are not being held in El Paso at all. Instead, the picture that has emerged is of a father and son moved quickly from Minnesota to a South Texas family facility, out of sight but very much still inside the federal system.
How a Preschool Pickup Turned Into an ICE Arrest
The chain of events that landed Liam in Texas started in the most ordinary way possible, with a school day at Valley View Elementary. Liam is a student in the “PreK 4” program at the Columbia Heights school, and staff watched him leave with his father after class, just like any other afternoon. What happened next, according to multiple witnesses, was anything but routine. Federal immigration agents were waiting near the family’s home, and within a short window of time, the 5-year-old boy was in government custody. One detailed account describes how a 5-year-old boy taken from his Minnesota neighborhood ended up in the hands of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Federal officials have offered their own version of that moment. They say that as agents approached the vehicle, the driver, identified as Adrian Alexander Conejo, fled on foot, abandoning his child in the car. In that telling, agents had to act for the child’s safety and bring him into custody. People close to the family strongly dispute the idea that Adrian simply ran away and left Liam behind, and online debates have broken out over what exactly happened in those crucial minutes. A widely shared thread, for example, shows commenters arguing over whether the father “ran away” or was taken along with his son, with one post from Michael Raymond In describing how the father had simply been coming home from preschool with his son. That clash of narratives has become a central tension in how the public reads the case.
Inside the Columbia Heights School’s Shock and Anger
Back at Valley View Elementary, the fallout has been deeply personal. Teachers and administrators are not talking in abstract policy terms, they are talking about a child who left his classroom cubby with a stuffed turtle, a hat, and a W worksheet still waiting for him. One local education report captured the mood with a simple detail: staff say it is unclear when or whether Liam will be able to return for those small pieces of his daily routine. That image, a half-finished letter worksheet and a missing 5-year-old, has stuck with many parents in the district.
School leaders have also been unusually blunt about what they think happened. Columbia Heights Public Schools superintendent Zena Stenvik has publicly pushed back on claims that agents had no other options, saying another adult living in the home was outside and ready to care for the child. In her account, the boy was effectively used as leverage to get to his father, a tactic she described as using a 5-year-old as “bait.” A detailed post quoting the superintendent states that, according to Columbia Heights Public and Zena Stenvik, there was another adult present and the family was not a flight risk. For educators who see their job as protecting kids, the idea that federal agents would stage an arrest around a preschooler’s schedule has landed as a profound breach of trust.
What Witnesses Saw in the Neighborhood
The neighborhood around Liam’s home has become a key source of eyewitness accounts that complicate the official story. Residents describe a scene that escalated quickly, with unmarked vehicles, agents in tactical gear, and a small boy suddenly at the center of a federal operation. One Columbia Heights city council member, Rachel James, lives near the family and has said she saw the child with agents and offered to take him herself. Others in the area also reportedly stepped forward, asking to care for Liam so he would not be taken away by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Those offers were declined, and the boy was placed in a government vehicle instead.
Images and video clips from the scene have since circulated widely. One widely shared reel shows ICE agents standing next to a small boy identified as Liam, with the clip racking up tens of thousands of likes and comments. Another report describes how ICE agents stand next to a boy witnesses identified as Liam Conejo Ramos, reinforcing that this was not a quiet, behind-closed-doors arrest. The visual of a 5-year-old flanked by armed officers has become one of the defining images of the case, and it is shaping how people across the country interpret what happened in that Minnesota cul-de-sac.
The Family’s Asylum Case and Legal Status
Behind the viral clips and emotional statements is a more technical but crucial fact: Liam and his father are not random targets picked up off the street, they are asylum seekers already in the immigration court system. Federal records show that the family has an active asylum case and that there are no deportation orders listed for either of them. According to the Justice Department’s Justice Department Executive Office for Immigration Review, both of their cases are marked as pending, which means they cannot simply be put on a plane and removed from the country overnight.
That legal posture is part of why advocates say the arrest was unnecessary and heavy handed. One detailed breakdown notes that the 5-year-old taken into has an active immigration case that effectively blocks deportation for now. The family reportedly entered the system through the CBP One phone app, a tool the government uses to schedule asylum appointments at ports of entry. That means they were following the process laid out by federal authorities rather than trying to evade it. For immigration lawyers, that detail is not just a footnote, it is central to the argument that enforcement in this case was about sending a message, not about closing a loophole.
Why Officials Say They Acted
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, for its part, has framed the operation as a necessary response to a parent who tried to flee. In their account, agents approached the vehicle, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias bolted, and officers had to secure the child to keep him safe. A federal summary of the incident states that Immigration and Customs detained a 5-year-old boy in Minnesota after he came home from school, and that federal officers were acting within their enforcement authority. Officials have also emphasized that the child is now with his father in a family facility, not separated into a different system.
At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has pushed back on some of the most explosive claims, including the idea that Liam was deliberately used as bait. One detailed “here’s what we know” style breakdown notes that DHS disputes parts of the school officials’ narrative, even as it confirms that the child is being held at a family detention facility in Texas. That report, which walks through the government’s version of events, explains that Here the agency argues it had no choice once the father allegedly ran. The gap between that framing and what neighbors and school leaders describe is exactly where public trust tends to fray.
How Trump-Era Child Detention Policies Shape This Case
Liam’s detention is not happening in a vacuum, it is unfolding under a set of policies that have steadily expanded the government’s willingness to hold children in immigration custody. Under President Trump, the administration has leaned into detention as a core enforcement tool, including for families and minors. A detailed analysis of What the Trump administration’s policies say about detaining immigrant children notes that the detention of Liam Conejo Ramos fits into a broader pattern of using custody not just to hold people for court, but also to deter future migrants from coming.
That context helps explain why this one 5-year-old has drawn so much attention. Advocates see his case as a test of how far the government is willing to go in applying those policies, especially when the child involved is a preschooler with an active asylum claim. The same analysis points out that the detention of Liam Conejo Ramos is not an isolated glitch, but part of a system that has steadily normalized holding kids in facilities like Dilley. For critics, that is exactly the problem: once the machinery is built, it becomes far too easy to justify putting a 5-year-old inside it.
Public Pressure and the Push for Release
As word of Liam’s detention spread, so did calls for his release. Community members in Minnesota organized quickly, with parents, teachers, and local officials demanding that the boy be returned home while his case plays out. Nationally, the story has ricocheted across social media, with clips of the arrest and photos of Liam in his preschool classroom fueling a wave of outrage. One widely shared video report notes that Soon after Liam and his dad arrived home from school, they were taken away by agents, and that the family has an active asylum case. That timeline has become a rallying point for people who argue that following the rules should not end with a child in detention.
Pressure is not just coming from activists. Local officials like Columbia Heights council member Rachel James, who personally offered to take the child, have used their platforms to question why federal officers refused community help. Advocacy groups have amplified statements from school leaders and neighbors, pointing to the fact that pressure mounts for the release of the 5-year-old held at the South Texas family detention center. For now, though, Liam remains in custody with his father, and advocates are left to hope that public scrutiny will push officials toward a different outcome.
More from Vinyl and Velvet:
Leave a Reply